
Amos Kimunya could hardly have been blunter.
As the annual meeting of the African Development Bank (AfDA) here last week celebrated China's booming aid and trade with
Africa, the Kenyan finance minister verged on the undiplomatic.
"The question we have to ask ourselves" as China plows billions of dollars into Africa and snaps up its oil and minerals,
he told fellow ministers, "is, 'is this a blessing or a curse?' "
At
a much smaller and more discreet gathering on the sidelines of the AfDB
shindig, African and Chinese civil society groups were meeting for the
first time to plan how they could at least take some of the rough edges
off a relationship that has sparked controversy well beyond Africa's
borders.
But holding the Chinese government to account for its behavior in Africa will be a tall order for Chinese nongovernmental
organizations that are still testing the political waters and have no international experience.
"The problem for us Chinese is that we are not aware of the projects" Beijing is funding in Africa, says Wen Bo, a leading
Chinese environmental activist. "Chinese people don't know what Chinese companies are doing in Africa."
That
worries Charles Mutasa, head of the nongovernmental African Network on
Debt and Development. "The absence of Chinese pressure groups lobbying
about environmental damage makes the whole business of China [in
Africa] a bit tricky," he says, because there are no Chinese civil
society watchdogs keeping an eye on their government and investors.
The Chinese NGO community is still small
and politically constrained, says Nick Young, who heads the
Beijing-based China Development Brief, which monitors the development
of Chinese civil society groups.
While international campaigning groups
deliberately seek issues on which to attack their governments, Chinese
NGOs navigating in often ambiguous legal limbo are a "mirror image,"
says Mr. Young. "Most of them will look for points on which they agree
with the government and start there. They are committed to being
constructive."
Nor do many Chinese NGOs, most of which
work on the environment, health, and poverty reduction, pay any
attention to the world beyond their borders. That is partly because
they are overwhelmed by the problems they face at home and partly
because they are ill informed about Chinese activities abroad,
activists say.
"It is a far leap for Chinese citizens to think about the problems of African farmers," points out Justin Fong, the founder
of Moving Mountains, a Beijing-based NGO that trains public-interest activists.
But
as China plays an ever larger role on the world stage, he forecasts,
its people will broaden their horizons, too. "As Chinese step into
their role as global citizens, hopefully they will become more engaged
in foreign policy," he says.
A South-South solution
That
would add a new dimension to "South-South cooperation" – a development
model that held out hope that the developing countries that dominate
the southern hemisphere and of which China has long seen itself as
champion – could benefit each others' economies through technical
assistance and increased trade. The governments of many developing
countries hoped that such cooperation would spare them the
self-interested economic policies perceived to come from the North's
developed nations.
Today, with China pledging to double its aid by 2009 to around $12 billion and having already grown its trade with Africa
10-fold between 1999 and 2006, "South-South cooperation" is no longer a dream. But nor is it all milk and honey.
China's
natural resource grab carries "disturbing echoes of the way the West
dealt with Africa," worries Walden Bello, an activist academic from the
Philippines who has long promoted closer links among developing
countries. "There is a lot of caution among lots of us who had been
looking forward" to a new era of international relations, he adds.
South African Finance Minister Trevor
Manuel explains the dilemma more starkly. "The key must be mutual
benefit," he told Chinese and African officials at the AfDB meeting.
"Otherwise we might end up with a few holes in the ground where the
resources have been extracted, and all the added value will be in
China."
Aside from allegations that China is
treating Africa in a neocolonial economic fashion, the Eastern giant
has also been accused of propping up dictators just as Western
countries have done, and of showing little environmental or social
responsibility in its African investments.
By deliberately attaching no conditions to its aid and investment, in a sign of South-South solidarity and noninterference,
China has also been charged with failing to encourage better governance in Africa.
A 'huge gap' open for Chinese aid
But
with Western donors failing to keep their promises to double their aid
to Africa, and World Bank and International Monetary Fund
pro-privatization policies frustrating many African leaders, "China's
entry onto the scene on the whole offers a lot of promise," argues
Jeffrey Sachs, the economist who heads the Earth Institute, a New York
development think tank.
Western donors' reluctance to help African governments fund large public-sector infrastructure projects, he says, fills "a
huge gap in needs where the Chinese are finding their way.
"China could end up doing things that are unhelpful," he adds, "but more likely than not, its presence will be helpful."
Certainly
Chinese money has offered African leaders an alternative to Western aid
that often promotes privatization and painful belt-tightening economic
policies. "We offer African governments a choice, and more choice is a
good thing for them," says Li Anshan, deputy head of the department of
African studies at Peking University.
Striving for a louder voice
Chinese NGOs trying to monitor the choices on offer, though, must take their political circumstances into account.
Even
if an NGO did find a way to galvanize Chinese public opinion about the
social impact of a dam in Sudan, for example, it would not dare attempt
to mobilize a mass movement, as a Western NGO might try. But other
avenues are open, argues Ge Yun, director of the Xinjiang Conservation
Fund.
"China wants to be a responsible member of the international community," she says. "The government cares about losing face
in the international arena. This is the perspective from which we can appeal to the government."
Already some local NGOs are adopting some of the tactics their Western counterparts have refined, such as pressuring banks
not to lend to companies that abuse the environment or their workforce.
Yu Xiaogang, an environmental activist from the southWestern province of Yunnan, hopes to take that further.
"Chinese NGOs must develop good knowledge of Chinese financial institutions' international policies and their impact," he
says.
"Our hope," he adds, is that within three to five years, we NGOs can join in large project policymaking" by institutions such
as China Eximbank, which funds billions of dollars' worth of infrastructure projects in Africa.