FEATURE-China faces uphill battle to turn its growth Green
21 Feb 2006 01:31:13 GMT,Source: Reuters
Residents of the 2008 Olympic Games host city watch the air
quality index like they do the weather forecast. POLLUTION RIOTS
By Lindsay Beck BEIJING, Feb 21 (Reuters) - There are days in Beijing the
smog is so thick residents can stare straight at the sun. Some Chinese cities may dazzle with gleaming skyscrapers
and some rural backwaters have been transformed into industrial
hubs, but more than two decades of 9.5 percent annual growth
have come at a cost. Now the country is trying to calculate exactly what price
it is paying for choking smog, poisoned rivers and toxic waste,
floating the concept of a "Green GDP" index likely to be
debated at the annual parliament session that convenes on March
5. "Green GDP deducts ecological and environmental losses. It
is able to more fully test and measure the quality of economic
development and avoid false achievements," Pan Yue, deputy
chief of China's environment body and its most outspoken green
crusader, said in an interview with local media. It's an idea that fits with the model of development that
the leadership under President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao
has been trying to project, one of tempering the pace of
economic growth with a focus on balanced growth. The changes are likely to be tough to implement. Local
leaders are accustomed to being judged on growth above all else
and would be fearful that stricter environmental controls would
impact their bottom line. A first step, analysts say, is establishing a system of
green accounting to get a more accurate idea of the costs
associated with degradation. "It is evident to any thinking person that things need to
be changed. What is not clear is what strategy to use," said
Andres Liebenthal, an environment specialist at the World Bank. A number of pilot projects are under way to test green
accounting systems, but there are a whole series of instruments
that could be adjusted if a complete green GDP system were
adopted, including pricing systems and natural resource taxes. "The price of water only reflects the transport and
treatment, for example, not the scarcity value or the costs
associated with pollution," said Liebenthal. GREEN OFFICIALS While Green GDP is an idea popular with top leaders trying
to keep a growing gap between rich and poor in check and
counter social instability, it is also likely to be less
appealing to local officials after investment dollars and tax
revenues. The government is trying to change that, with wide-ranging
regulations that aim to integrate environmental losses into the
measurement of regional development -- and into the evaluation
of local officials. "If you really want to change, you need to develop a system
in which the environment is a parameter that plays a more and
more important role in the status or evaluation of local
officials' behaviour," said Zhang Jianyu, China manager of
U.S.-based Environmental Defense. But with China home to 20 of the world's 30 most
smog-choked cities, with some 400,000 premature deaths a year
linked to air pollution and with degradation a frequent cause
of riots, the need to transform near-daily pledges to clean up
the environment into action is becoming ever more acute. "Estimates maintain that 7 percent annual growth is
required to preserve social stability. Yet the costs of
pollution are already taxing the economy between 8 and 12
percent of GDP per year," Nathan Nankivell, a researcher at
Canada's Department of National Defence, wrote in a recent
report. In the Zhejiang town of Xinchang, it took a riot to shut
down a local factory that had been dumping its waste into the
river. The factory may have provided revenue to local
authorities, but the question for residents was at what cost. "The situation has been better since the protest but of
course there has still been a negative impact on us. Just look
at the crops," said one resident surnamed Song, gesturing
toward the poisoned fields from the window of her small shop. The Xinchang protest was one of three riots in Zhejiang
alone last year over pollution. Across the country, China has earmarked $3.3 billion to
clean up the Songhua River in the northeast, poisoned last
November after an explosion at a chemical plant caused a toxic
spill that contaminated drinking water supplies for millions. Economists vary on just how much environmental woes are
costing. The World Bank estimates air and water pollution cost
China about 8 percent of GDP. But different provinces may have vastly different costs.
For example, in Shanxi -- China's top coal-producing province
-- if environmental degradation and pollution were incorporated
into GDP calculations, they would negate all growth for the
past decade, a Deutsche Bank report cites officials there as
saying. Despite the economic imperative, analysts say China's
environmental leaders are likely to have a tough sell ahead of
them to make Green GDP a meaningful policy. "It's a very good idea," said Environmental Defense's
Zhang. "But the practicality of that and how applicable it is
in local situations is something very hard to do."
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home